To: Vigilanteman
there has got to be a serious hidden defectThere is. Beginning with this plan
move with voluntary private accounts sweetened with a generous match from the federal government
Just another renamed entitlement program from the federal government.
14 posted on
11/15/2007 9:10:12 PM PST by
billbears
(Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
To: billbears; Vigilanteman
The lure of the accounts is that the government would match, on a 2 1/2 to 1 basis, contributions from the first $1,000 of wages each month; for contributions from wages above that amount, the government would match 50 cents for every dollar contributed. For those who chose to participate in the accounts, however, their guaranteed benefits would be further reduced -- about 30 percent over the course of a career -- or they would have to work an additional five years beyond the current retirement age (now 67) to receive full benefits. Over time, Mr. Thompson argues, this is a good bargain: Workers would probably accumulate significant nest eggs, more than offsetting the reduction in benefits.
18 posted on
11/15/2007 9:47:08 PM PST by
ellery
(I don't remember a constitutional amendment that gives you the right not to be identified-R.Giuliani)
To: billbears
Just another renamed entitlement program from the federal government. Considering that this "match" is coming from the FICA taxes the wage earner is already paying, I'd simply call it a refund (with restrictions) rather than an entitlement.
29 posted on
11/16/2007 5:04:05 AM PST by
kevkrom
("Should government be doing this? And if so, then at what level of government?" - FDT)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson