Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zionist Conspirator

Yes, I did leave out the” not the word ....”. but as for the first remark, but as for the first, what I mean is that revelation is not only by the spoken word. The fact that Our Lord Was crucified or that He planned for Joseph to provide a refuge for the children of Israel in Egypt, speaks as loudly as anything the prophets said.


106 posted on 11/20/2007 9:04:48 AM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: RobbyS
Yes, I did leave out the” not the word ....”. but as for the first remark, but as for the first, what I mean is that revelation is not only by the spoken word. The fact that Our Lord Was crucified or that He planned for Joseph to provide a refuge for the children of Israel in Egypt, speaks as loudly as anything the prophets said.

So you're saying that Protestants conflate total inerrancy with total sufficiency. Yet what you fail to notice is that Catholics also tend to conflate the two and demonstrate their rejection of the latter by also rejecting the former.

There is no excuse for anyone of any religion to conflate the two. This is easily proven as follows: is Genesis totally inerrant? Yes it is. Is it totally sufficient? No it is not. Expand to include the entire Bible, and there you have it.

107 posted on 11/20/2007 9:37:48 AM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Lo' Ya`aqov ye'amer `od shimkha ki-'im Yisra'el; ki-sariyta `im-'Eloqim ve`im-'anashim vatukhal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson