I support Fred...but I think you overstate the NRTL endorsements impact. I think Fred’s position on abortion makes sense, but a lot of hard core anti-abortionists don’t seem to agree with me.
Endorsements don’t mean squat.
Only the most informed voter’s even know what the NRLC is.
The conservative pro-life faction of the Republican party is hopelessly divided between all the major candidates—yes, even Giuliani. There is no evidence yet that this one endorsement is going to change any of that.
NRLC has chapters but Huck may have actual churches and the die-hard pro-lifers are more likely to listen to what they hear from church. I mean...fred can’t really “out christian” Huck so he has to have something else. Huck has his fair tax and very strong on the 2nd amendment. So he does have his “red meat” to disguise his other liberal views.
Did your candidate just receive the endorsement of the National Right To Life Committee with 3,000 chapters in ALL 50 states? I didn’t think so! Do you understand what that means? Millions of pro-life members and supporters who will now fundraise and volunteer for FRed!
Funny how convenient that is being said. When the others received endorsements, Fred supporters were saying that it won’t matter people don’t follow endorsements but now that Fred received an endorsement they are important. How typical.