Ok, I see now we’re getting to the point where you guys are posting in CAPITAL LETTERS rather than discussing the analysis on the analysis thread. The reason: Because this makes your candidate look bad and you don’t like it. Try to think about what this particular thread is all about, that Thompson argues the polls will change. When all you have left is insults and shrill capital-letter-bold-italic comments, it shows that you’re afraid of how this shows your candidate in the negative light. He’s had the positive light, and squandered the lead in the polls and a 30 point lead at Intrade, and with a negative light his followers end up getting shrill. The candidacy shows more signs of imploding than turning around.
I was emphasizing the point you seem to miss.
The reason: Because this makes your candidate look bad and you don’t like it.
This has nothing to do with "my candidate" or your candidate. You're simply wrong, and you apparently have no idea what you're talking about. The points I'm making actually work against Thompson -- it shows that despite his relatively high polling, the market perceives him as having a small (but finite) probability of winning.