Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spunky; All

Simcox, all this money for a ‘cow fence’? I should know.
Where did the donated money go, for only this ??!!!?
Something’s very fishy.
I am a supporter of CLOSED REGULATED US borders. It’s past time to have this current outlaw condition to continue as it is. Our society, infrastructure and cities can’t handle illegal immigration ANYMORE. I have been in the frontlines, public protests, call-in campaignes, and in several ‘secure the borders’ groups for many years now.
Something’s very fishy.
Friend’s of the Border Patrol group has had it’s political problems with it’s leader and it’s disappearing donated funds.
Something’s very fishy.
Mr. Glilchrist (MM) supporting Huckabee.
Something’s very fishy.
Joe Turner’s, (Save Our State) another failed run for political office and all his failed intitiatives in the past. Falling out with Jim Gilchrist and other ‘secure the borders’ groups like No More Invasion and such. Chelene Nightengale and Don Silva scary aversion to new ideas and street activist actions comming from general members.
Something’s very fishy.
Dennis Slater, (No More Invasion) with his wholesale forum censorship and close personal retention of a ring of unthinking ‘yes-men’ in that mindless fifedom with gleeful hatchetman of general ‘unrulely’ members, Don Silva.
Something’s very fishy.
I am very confused.

I read this somewhere, and I agree with this ‘Op Ed’ piece. It bears re-posting...
QUOTE “Presently, I am truly beginning to believe the groups fighting the illegal alien menace is one big ego club for it’s leaders and that if you disagree or question anything about it; you are immediately attacked, ostracized and made an outcast. Often several ‘secure the borders’ groups staff’s well-known Internet public forum banning rules are corrupted/adapted and not followed by staff. No forum staff warnings are given to some ‘special hard-case’ active ‘secure the borders’ members that the staff personally doesn’t like. One simple initial ‘one week’ bans are secretly and unethically converted into ‘BANNED FOR LIFE’. All the while, the oblivious general member learns of the new LIFE BAN later. It is clearly an excuse for corrupt egotisitc staff to get rid of ‘too’ different thinking general members. If this keeps up the ‘secure the borders’ groups will lose beneficial new ideas & new activists. The irony is currently that several ‘secure the borders’ group’s staff is now crying out to general members to get more involved with posting more ideas and more people participating more public activities.
Why?
When active idea-driven members speak out (too) much, the ego driven staff will quickly ban you from getting too much of the public forum ‘spotlight’. These ‘secure the borders’ groups staff are making this a petty popularity contest and proving it with their immature words and actions against consistantly beneficial long-time members, who are routinely banned off the forums for silly personality conflicts. This is just a sample of the staff unethical dealings. There are even MORE problems in these groups. If general members contact staffers for assistance or for help with other abusive club members, general members get very little assistance or get several conflicting advice on their problems. Or general members are told that the ‘secure the borders’ groups don’t have ‘a staff’ to straighten out these problems. That’s strange because the very people who says there is no staff are routinely quoted and identified in the new’s articles as ‘staff media spokesperson or public event co-odinator’. Of in another instance, the group’s leaders (who says there is no staff) then order other general members around in accomplishing club activities. Clearly, the mythical ‘staff’ are accomplishing group responsibilites and events for the betterment of club. There are even MORE problems. A general member could only hope that most members do NOT believe this saying, “Go along to get along and the end justifies ANY means”, philosophy. People are beginning to believe that illegal immigration movement leaders(like this) want and need general supporters who don’t rock the boat. That is NOT what the mission needs or what ethical people seeking an end to the illegal alien problem want.”
UNQUOTE

Something’s very fishy.
I am a supporter of CLOSED REGULATED US borders. It’s past time to have this current outlaw condition to continue as it is. Our society, infrastructure and cities can’t handle illegal immigration ANYMORE. I have been in the frontlines, public protests, call-in campaignes, and in several ‘secure the borders’ groups for many years now. They should clean up their act and stay extremely ethical on these matters. To NOT do so, only corrupts us and what we are fighting for.


35 posted on 12/14/2007 1:19:00 PM PST by cowboy_code (Note for visitors at Arafat's grave - first dance, THEN pee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: cowboy_code

Go to the link in #4 and click on the video link.

I’m thinking the barbed wire fence was set up to keep animals from wandering into the area where the 14 ft fence is being built. Maybe that will be replaced by another 14 ft fence after they finish the one they building now.


36 posted on 12/14/2007 1:35:06 PM PST by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: cowboy_code
Something’s very fishy.

"Bogus arguments are a tip-off that you wouldn't buy the real reasons for what someone is doing."
--Thomas Sowell

41 posted on 12/16/2007 6:35:03 PM PST by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson