Skip to comments.
Fred comes out swinging, Romney swings back
My Man Mitt ^
| Nov 15 2007
| by Justin Hart
Posted on 11/15/2007 11:58:21 AM PST by restornu
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-269 next last
1
posted on
11/15/2007 11:58:22 AM PST
by
restornu
To: Abbeville Conservative; asparagus; Austin1; bcbuster; bethtopaz; BlueAngel; Bluestateredman; ...
2
posted on
11/15/2007 11:59:10 AM PST
by
restornu
(Improve The Shining Moment! Don't let them pass you by... PRESS FORWARD MITT)
To: restornu; Petronski; Politicalmom
It’s going to get much tougher for Mitt the panderer .
3
posted on
11/15/2007 12:01:13 PM PST
by
Neu Pragmatist
(Unite against Rudy ! - Vote Thompson ! - It's the only way to beat Hillary !)
To: restornu
The other big charge, that Romney happily included a low-cost abortion option in the plan. False. The law of Massachusetts REQUIRES that medical care fund abortions. Nice spin, but the plan includes a $50 copay for all abortions, not just "medically necessary" ones.
4
posted on
11/15/2007 12:02:05 PM PST
by
kevkrom
("Should government be doing this? And if so, then at what level of government?" - FDT)
To: restornu
RINOs install a big government socialist program then blame the Democrats for doing what Democrats do? Romney is an idiot.
5
posted on
11/15/2007 12:03:51 PM PST
by
Jim Robinson
(Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
To: restornu
I don't care WHAT the socialized health care Romney-Plan provides; it's nowhere in the U.S. Constitution that the Gubmint is supposed to provide insurance coverage by taking from one citizen, and handing it over to another.
Socialized Medicine has NEVER improved healthcare systems anywhere in the world to a point they even can compare to our current quality available.
I'll decide what I consider for myself and my family, NOT depend on the whims of politicians, nor do I want to pay for others coverage for high-risk lifestyles, lack of responsibility, and dependence on a Nanny-State for their benefits.
Wealth-redistribution by ANY name is socialism, and I don't support any of it whatsoever.
To: restornu
"Given these limitations, Governor Romney deserves credit for proposing (and to a lesser extent, enacting) a plan that encourages individually-owned health insurance and circumvents some of the inequities carved into the federal tax code." (The Club For Growth, "Mitt Romney's Record On Economic Issues," Press Release, 8/21/07)Of course, the same release also says:
To be sure, the Massachusetts plan's individual mandate to purchase healthcare insurance rankles libertarian instincts and necessitates a government-defined standard for compliance-and Romney should be taken to task for this.
7
posted on
11/15/2007 12:05:42 PM PST
by
kevkrom
("Should government be doing this? And if so, then at what level of government?" - FDT)
To: restornu
The other big charge, that Romney happily included a low-cost abortion option in the plan. False. The law of Massachusetts REQUIRES that medical care fund abortions. If you want to blame someone, blame the Supreme Court of Mass.:
'They made me do it!'
Pathetic.
8
posted on
11/15/2007 12:07:34 PM PST
by
eastsider
To: restornu
"The law appears to be working. As of Nov. 1, the date for the most recent statistics, more than 200,000 formerly uninsured people had gotten insurance, roughly half of the state's target." (Glen Johnson, "Rivals Chide Romney On Health Care Plan," The Associated Press, 11/15/07) Followed immediately by:
Nonetheless, Romney has distanced himself from the mandate. The national health insurance provisions he unveiled earlier this year specifically avoid a mandate. Romney has said he would leave it up to the states to devise their own plans. He later criticized Democratic front-runner Hillary Rodham Clinton for including a mandate in her health care proposal.
9
posted on
11/15/2007 12:07:55 PM PST
by
kevkrom
("Should government be doing this? And if so, then at what level of government?" - FDT)
To: All
10
posted on
11/15/2007 12:10:09 PM PST
by
restornu
(Improve The Shining Moment! Don't let them pass you by... PRESS FORWARD MITT)
To: kevkrom
Romney is a big government socialist.
11
posted on
11/15/2007 12:10:17 PM PST
by
Jim Robinson
(Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
To: Jim Robinson
To: traditional1
Careful you’ll get everyone from queers, hos ( men and women ), reckless drivers, bungee jumpers, and smokers on your case.
To: restornu
By 2006, Mitt was well into Presidential campaign mode, so anything he did at this late date would not be indicative of the real Romney. You’d probably have to go back to 2002 and earlier to get a sense of the true Mitt.
14
posted on
11/15/2007 12:12:48 PM PST
by
rhinohunter
(Thompson/Steele '08)
To: Jim Robinson
Romney is a big government socialist. No argument here.
My biggest concern over the unlikely prospect of "President Romney" is that he'll be elected on the promise of "doing something" about health care, and wind up giving in to what the Democrat-controlled House and Senate (because I also see Romney as having zero "coat tails") gives him.
15
posted on
11/15/2007 12:13:35 PM PST
by
kevkrom
("Should government be doing this? And if so, then at what level of government?" - FDT)
To: restornu
To: restornu
There was a time when Romney was my choice for VP. Thanks to his latest passing-of-the-buck, that time is gone for good.
To: restornu
Lovely. Still waiting for your response to post #5.
18
posted on
11/15/2007 12:17:47 PM PST
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: restornu
If the blog is accurate, looks like Mitt deflects Fred's campaign manager's criticisms pretty well.
I do recall a few missteps earlier from Team Mitt though. How about the Rodent Hunter? How about a few barbs at Hillary for doing exactly what Mitt had done in office?
I don't know if any of this makes the news or not. It's inter-campaign sniping. Maybe we'll see reporting if it's a slow news day.
19
posted on
11/15/2007 12:20:06 PM PST
by
George W. Bush
(Apres moi, le deluge.)
To: restornu
Thanks for posting this. I really wish the Romney campaign would also address the other blatant lies that the Thompson campaign is telling, blaming Romney for something that a private citizen said.
20
posted on
11/15/2007 12:21:51 PM PST
by
Spiff
(<------ Click here for updated polling results. Go Mitt! www.mittromney.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-269 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson