Avoiding my question I see.
I explicitly said it would hurt our side. Do you have a problem with that?
I also asked you (DIRECTLY) If Hillary! isn't a bitch, please define what a bitch is.
"Bitch," is a perfectly good word in English. If and when the Archbishop of Canterbury uses it in reference to a human female, I would be happy to join him in so describing the wife of former president Clinton. In the meantime, Mrs. George H. W. Bush, a former first lady, said it best in regard to Mrs. B.J. Clinton: "She's not very nice. I would privately use a word that rhymes with witch to describe her."
Key word: "privately."
I explicitly said it would hurt our side. Do you have a problem with that?
Well, yeah. Why continue public use of the word if it hurts our cause? Why not explicitly explain in accurate English that this woman's real place in the Clinton WH was as the "Bimbo Eruption Handler?" In fact, that is pretty much the sum total of her "experience." We have real evidence that she used physical force to coerce her husband's victims into silence with private detectives she and her staff hired to actually threaten their safety.
Now ain't that a bitch? (Referring of course to the situation, not the person.)