Posted on 11/14/2007 10:56:58 PM PST by restornu
Well look at today and what situation have continue to grow in spite of our head in the sand!
1-
Government WILL control ALL land Saturday, October 20, 2007, AUDIO
Here Comes the Ameri-Dollar!
http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/regionalism/ameridollar.htm
A Warning for Property Owners (Boulder, CO) http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1924861/posts
There is some truth here but each must be careful in discernment what is fact and those who like to embellish!
This is for enlightenment not fear!
Socialism at it’s best!!!!!
This nation has ‘hell hole’ programmed into the on board navigator, and the cruise control set for maximum overdrive.
It seems like just about everything is coming unglued at the same time.
This wannabe-man is a traitorous commie scumbag.
“Transcript of article from: Phillip County News, Malta, Montana, 4 January 1934”
“This wannabe-man is a traitorous commie scumbag”
He’s also dead.
=))
Did you listen to this it is short?
http://www.brownfieldnetwork.com/gestalt/go.cfm?objectid=AF9563E3-B3E0-1D89-25B9B8A2DFC04F3E
CA AG Jerry Brown told attendees at a California Association of Counties conference that if they didn’t impose Agenda 21 concentrated development measures to reduce greenhouse gasses in land planning, he may sue them to enforce it.
Tugwell was part of FDR’s “brain trust”, as he liked to call it. If WWII had not intervened, I’ve no doubt old Eleanor would have had U.S. school children singing Commie anthems every morning. She was a true believer!
NIXON’S EXECUTIVE ORDER SUB-DIVIDING THE STATES
On February 10, 1972, as the nation’s press and TV were inundating the American people with coverage of Nixon’s upcoming journey to Communist China, the President signed Executive Order No. 11647, which then appeared in the FEDERAL REGISTER of February 12. There was virtually no comment in the nation’s press on this action.
By this Executive Order, the President by a stroke of the pen divided the United States into ten federal regions to be run by “Federal Regional Councils.”
In Executive Order No. 11647, the President decreed:
“There is hereby established a Federal Regional Council for each of the ten standard federal regions. Each Council shall be composed of the directors of the regional offices of the Departments of Labor, Health, Education, and Welfare, and Housing and Urban Development, the Secretarial Representative of the Department of Transportation, and the directors of the regional offices of the Office of Economic Opportunity, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration.
“The President shall designate one member of each such council as chairman of that council and such chairman shall serve at the pleasure of the President. Representatives of the Office of Management and Budget may participate in any deliberations of each council.”
The “ten standard federal regions” referred to by Nixon were delineated by him in a press release issued by the White House on May 21, 1969. Purporting to “streamline the structure and processes of federal agencies in the field,” the President then gave the alignment for the federal regions as follows: (The city in parentheses is the federal capital of each region.)
REGION I (Boston) - Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont.
REGION II (New York City) - New York, New Jersey, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.
REGION III (Philadelphia) -Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia.
REGION IV (Atlanta) -Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee.
REGION V (Chicago) -Illinois, Indiana, Minnesota, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin.
REGION VI (Dallas-Fort Worth) Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas.
REGION VII (Kansas City) - Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska.
REGION VIII (Denver) - Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming.
REGION IX (San Francisco) -Arizona, California, Hawaii, and Nevada.
REGION X (Seattle) - Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington.
As can be noted in the foregoing list, in all cases the lines drawn for these federal regions cross State lines, thus to all intents and purposes obliterating the sovereignty of the States.
FLAGRANT VIOLATION OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION
http://www.sweetliberty.org/beware_metro.html#Chapter%20I
In what form of “globalization” was Tugwell’s plan?
“FLAGRANT VIOLATION OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION” #12
Agree...But if it was so flagrant, where were the Dems or the Reps jumping up and down and crying foul ?...Can you imagine any Senator reading an Executive Order Sub-Dividing the States and just laughing that off ??....
Is it still in effect ?
Is this one fell swoop to avoid the hassel of eminent domain for the big highway?
Nope..That Executive Order was revoked in 1979...by Jimmeh Cahrta....
details:
Executive Order 12038—Relating to certain functions transferred to the Secretary of Energy by the Department of Energy Organization Act
Source: The provisions of Executive Order 12038 of Feb. 3, 1978, appear at 43 FR 4957, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 136, unless otherwise noted.
By virtue of the authority vested in me as President of the United States of America, in order to reflect the responsibilities of the Secretary of Energy for the performance of certain functions previously vested in other officers of the United States by direction of the President and subsequently transferred to the Secretary of Energy pursuant to the Department of Energy Organization Act (91 Stat. 565; 42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.), it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Functions of the Federal Energy Administration.
[Sec. 1 amends Executive Order 11647 of Feb. 10, 1972, which was revoked by Executive Order 12149 of July 20,
1979; Executive Order 11790of June 25, 1974, Chapter 10; Executive Order 11912of Apr. 13, 1976, Chapter 10; and Proc. 3279 of Mar. 10, 1959, which was revoked by Proc. 5141 of Dec. 22, 1983. The amendments have been incorporated into those documents codified in this volume.]
http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/executive-order/12038.html
One of the initial steps toward globalization, as I understand it, would be to nationalize land, resources, utilities, etc., so they could be used more effectively to support the global population.
It always seems to be the ultimate goal of socialist governments to proliferate and spread their theory of “government ALWAYS knows best” government. I haven’t been able to decide whether, for lefties of all generations, it’s a case of “misery loves company”, or a bleeding heart “can’t we all just get along” kind of thing that prompts their desire to spread socialism.
These are ideas and also meeting that have taken place and I think today we can see fragments starting to unfold how many of them or is there been some revision I think it is for us to careful observed.
I feel the more folks that are informed the less they have to fear for knowledge (awareness) is power.
Treaties Do Not Supersede the Constitution
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1926013/posts
“CREATIVE FEDERALISM”
The CFR and the CED are mindful that as they move forward in their power grab they must employ high-sounding catch phrases so that the voters will be unaware of the real significance of their various moves—until it is too late.
One of these catch phrases is “creative federalism.”
John W. Gardner, former Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, in a speech in 1966 said:
“Strictly speaking, ‘creative federalism’ refers to the relationship between the federal government and the states.”
Both the words “creative” and “federalism” have a seemingly innocuous sound. However, there is no need to redefine the “relationship” between the federal government and the individual States. This was done by the U.S. Constitution which clearly defined that the federal government is the creature of the sovereign States — not the other way around as the CFR and the CED would have it.
Senator Strom Thurmond, on April 11, 1966, in a report to his constituents in South Carolina, refers to “creative federalism” as nothing more than a Madison Avenue misnomer for the practice of injecting the federal government into every conceivable area of human activity under the guise of “aid”. He warned that present laws being introduced as a means of strengthening the States, counties and municipalities actually are making these units of government mere “subdivisions” in an all-powerful central government.
In the 1966 report of the Research and Policy Committee of the CED, we find the following under the heading “The New Federalism”:
“Sweeping initiatives by the national government, and to a lesser degree by a few state governments, have helped to fill the partial vacuum created by failures at the local level…
“Fiscal realities have modified the legal concept that the states are the fountain source of all governmental powers. The states have created the national government, assigning it certain functions and granting it essential powers. The powers of local units were also granted by the states. Realistically, however, capability of response to public desires and adequate financial resources take precedence over legal theory. The states seem less ‘sovereign’ with 20 percent of their total annual revenues drawn from the federal treasury”.
And it was planned that way. The sovereignty of the States is meant to diminish in direct ratio to the increase in federal “aid”.
[Sweet Liberty NOTE: The creatures which have gained control of our governmental system through the CFR, CED and their minions have no shame, and speak as though we — the people, and our duly elected representatives — are brainless idiots. The above and following paragraphs speak volumes. The usurpers insult our local and state elected officials insinuating that they (elected officials) and we (the people) are incapable of self (local) government and must be ruled. They have restructured our monetary system; instituted a back-breaking tax system (revenue sharing) taking billions of dollars from the States, returning pennies on the dollar and then claim federal control because the States receive “20 percent of their revenues from the federal treasury”. This corrupt system has been upheld by the corrupt courts, asserting that local and State governments must ‘obey’ federal mandates when they use ‘federal funds’.]
Putting St Louis under the control of Kansas City will not sit well with St, Louis. STL thinks it is the center of all things Missouri....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.