Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: beaversmom
Hi beaversmom. How are all the little beavs?

Today's "people's daily camera" has an article about this. Here is just one snippet:

The Kirlins said they understood the issue was that their neighbors wanted continued access through the property to their backyard. Don Kirlin said he offered to give the couple 5 feet of his land from the existing fence line to accommodate the concern, but his offer was rejected. He said he now thinks there was an ulterior motive for the lawsuit.

"I believe that their intent was not to have access to their backyard, as they claim, but actually to make my lot un-buildable so they would be able to maintain their view of the southwest."

Having 39 years experience with Boulderites, I'm betting he is correct.
45 posted on 11/15/2007 6:13:14 AM PST by mollynme (cogito, ergo freepum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mollynme

I think you would be safe in that bet.


46 posted on 11/15/2007 6:40:56 AM PST by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: mollynme

Property rights in Boulder, CO, is like religious freedom in Saudi Arabia.


95 posted on 11/17/2007 9:28:45 PM PST by coloradan (Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson