Do you have any arguments that you consider your own, or have you forever consigned yourself to the regurgitation of the hard-won ideas of others?
Yes, I have a lot of ideas of my own. The primary one is that ID is religion in disguise, dressed up in new clothes after the Edwards decision. It has no science behind it, only misrepresentations and outright lies. Its main proponent, the Dyscovery Institute hires lawyers and PR flacks to promote their religious belief because they are aware, more than anyone, that there is no science behind their efforts.
The whole sordid scheme was leaked somehow (see the Wedge Strategy).
I think they would love to see a theocracy, with them running the show. They wouldn't have to pretend to be doing science then!
I have lots more ideas, some based on several years of study at the graduate level in fossil man, osteology, and evolution, and a lot more based on more recent study.
Thank you for asking.
Ok Wiley,
Why don’t you present two or three of your evolutionary ideas, and back them up with the overwhelming evidence you keep talking about. I’m all ears.