Science, over the past couple of hundred years, has been pretty good at showing how things once thought to be supernatural are actually natural occurrences.Oh really? But I thought science had nothing to do with the supernatural. The supernatural is outside the scope of what science can discover. Science has enough to do without wasting it's time on hocus-pocus like that. What's it doing investigating it then?
You know exactly what was meant. Don't be a troll.
I’ve contended that scientists are wrong for ignoring an aspect of reality and I’ve been informed about how science does not deal with the supernatural, it’s out of the realm of science, it can’t deal with it, it only deals with the natural physical world that can be seen and measured, yada, yada, yada....
Now there’s bragging about how science has exposed the *truth* about what’s behind the supernatural and how great science is for doing it?
Here is a post addressing the issue:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1897820/posts?page=10#10
So which is it? Does it explore the supernatural or not?
How is it trolling pointing out inconsistencies in one’s statements?