[muawiyah]

None of this supports Creationism. It does, however, strongly suggest separate origins ~ that not all the critters on Earth derive entirely from critters that lived here.

[Diplomat]

None of this supports Creationism. It does, however, strongly suggest separate origins

Seperate origins is not Darwinian evolution. No where did the article even suggest this to be the case. All they do is suggest that these ancestors are likely to be more complex than their descedents.

Furthermore, no evolutionist, getting paid by our taxes, would ever make a statement like yours. It would be the equivalent of stating "please shut off all our funding, our work is bogus." Not going to happen. The college deans would go nuts over anything that would threaten their revenue stream.