What about legitimiate drugs that harm the fetus but help the mother? What if the mother has cancer and needs chemotherapy or she'll die. Chemo kills a fetus. But wait, under this law, the fetus is a person so killing the fetus would be murder. Under the law, you can't take one person's life to save another, so sorry, mom, you'll have to die of cancer (and probably your fetus with you).
It's a ridiculious example, but that's because this is a ridicuious proposal. Colorado would have to spend decades amending its statutes and changing case law to conform to this new definition and they'd still never get it right. Better just fight the fight head on and get Roe repealed. Like I said above, tricks like this just don't work.
I think (as I have stated in my previous post): The intent is what matters; if the mother (and doctor’s intent) isnt to kill the baby, but to save the life of the mother (and there is no way around it; it’s a hard choice, but..) it isn’t the same as a mother intentionally abortiong her healthy baby and having him murdered by a shameful abortion doctor!~..see my point?