First off I did not use the word HATE you did, so if you hate someone it's your problem. Next I did not make an argument about anything, I pointed out that 20 and 25% results didn't mean much and that you could not win an election in this country when a large percentage of the conservatives walk because you, the candidate, are liberal rinos.
Hate/oppose, I didn’t mean to change the connotation, I meant hate in the sense of won’t vote for, which is what you suggest when you say they will walk.
Your rebuttal makes my point even more, because if you are saying that 20% means 80% will WALK, then with Thompson’s 19% it means 81% will walk.
My point, which you ignored, is that MORE conservatives picked Romney than Thompson, so if that is a sign of how many will WALK (which it isn’t), Thompson’s worse than Romney.
You equated 20% support with 80% opposition, which was an absurd statement. I illustrated that by noting that your own argument meanst Thompson has 81% opposition from conservatives, which is decidedly not true.