Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Aloysius88
How about allowing the scientific evidence that is unfriendly toward evolution? In fact how about allowing the evidence to be examined.

Why don't you present it for us?

Then, maybe you can tell us about the scientific evidence that supports intelligent design?

76 posted on 11/13/2007 3:36:49 PM PST by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: Amelia

How about you show us some mutants that are superior to their parents, and some transitional fossils that show marked improvement?


83 posted on 11/13/2007 3:53:06 PM PST by omega4179 (fred08 dot com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

To: Amelia

The evidence is presented, among other places, in a book called “The Edge of Evolution” by Michael Behe. Before you claim that Behe has been refuted you better be able to point to one concrete example of stepwise evolution of a complex biological mechanism or system. Sometimes the reason we can’t find something is because it does not exist, i.e. mutations leading to improved organisms that came into existence by teeny changes accumulated over time.

The theory of Darwinian Evolution does not allow for accumulated changes. Each change must be “macro” enough to be tested by natural selection and “micro” enough to represent a single mutation. The statistical likelihood of such a thing happening within the time frame of 18 billion years and a universe of 10 to the 80th particles makes a miracle seem like a sure thing. And if evolution requires miracles how is it natural?


114 posted on 11/14/2007 9:35:35 AM PST by Aloysius88 (I used to be the different drummer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson