Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alamo-Girl; xzins; betty boop; highball; steve-b; P-Marlowe; MHGinTN; TXnMA
Somewhere along the way, the high court has reinterpreted "freedom of religion" to mean "freedom from religion."

And this is the heart of it. The Constitution, specifically the First Amendment, was constructed to protect religious expression (the right of conscience, or ‘free exercise’) and to prohibit its banishment from the public square. Just the opposite of what we are witnessing now. The intent was to expel from the federal government the predominance of any one Christian denomination over others in the allocation of tax monies or in the granting of other special considerations, so that none would go to any, not to deny all access to the public square. The Founding Fathers never, even for a moment, entertained the peculiar idea that religion (‘moral instruction’) had no place in government, but simply that one denomination could not be favored over the rest.

But a curious thing has happened on the way to the education system becoming the missionary of atheism on the public dole, empowered by the judiciary – the parents have started pulling their kids out. Evidently not so much because of the atheism but the teaching of politics and immorality (gay activism) – pressuring the children with “don’t tell your parents, but…”

Just as in the late Eighteenth Century the people objected to being taxed to support the ministers of a church different than their own, and their children being baptized in a church different from theirs. So religious establishment was denied from the federal government, and was done away with in the states over the first fifty years of the Union.

171 posted on 11/15/2007 8:02:05 PM PST by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]


To: YHAOS; betty boop
Thank you oh so very much for sharing your wonderful insights, dear YHAOS!

The Constitution, specifically the First Amendment, was constructed to protect religious expression (the right of conscience, or ‘free exercise’) and to prohibit its banishment from the public square. Just the opposite of what we are witnessing now.

So very true. Sadly...

Just as in the late Eighteenth Century the people objected to being taxed to support the ministers of a church different than their own, and their children being baptized in a church different from theirs.

Indeed. I wonder what will happen next.

177 posted on 11/15/2007 11:08:07 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson