I’ve defended Fred on attack-Fred threads. But Fred supporters do a good job of that, so I don’t have to do it much myself.
If I engage in it at all, I hope I’m called on it. I want to discuss issues and policy. I want to be able to have a real debate about Hucakabee, rather than the trivial name-calling we always end up with. There are people with facts which seem to point to opposite conclusions, and there has to be a truth somewhere in there but we’ll never figure it out because anybody who tries to approach the question dispassionately will get crushed before any good comes of it.
Intellectual or subtle jabs don't count of course...
I don't recall seeing you quite as impassioned defending Fred or his supporters as you do the Mitt team.
And how did Huckabee get in the mix? I thought you were "torn" between FDT and Mitt...
Huckabee is a nanny state person.
I don’t care how you feel about smoking and smokers, his stand is contrary to liberty and our principles.
After he lost all that wait, he’ll be taxing Bad Food next. And he’ll be the one to decide what that is.
I could vote for him against Hillary, but I hope it doesn’t come to that.