Right, I don’t buy that for a second. I read what you wrote, you did not say “According to Dobson” or anything of that nature...
You made a statement.
***That’s fine, and I’ll stick by it. I probably should have said “according to Dobson” and in my mind it was certainly present but if I didn’t write it, that’s that. As you can see, I wasn’t making a big deal out of whether Fred is a christian or not, I was pointing out that Fred didn’t get Dobson’s endorsement.
If you had manned up and said “yes, that is what I said” I’d have a lot more respect.
***Oh, well. That’s the way things go. My read on this particular statement is that you’re just trying to get me started. Question the manlihood, that’ll work.
This parsing and obfuscating dance you often do is tiring,
***Nonsense. Read the posts. It is a simple point being made, and Petronski zeroed in on a single part of it. Fred followers are awfully jumpy.
and to be honest, since I have seen hints of good intellect in your work, it should be beneath you.
***Read through it again and you will see honesty and intellect in my responses. And also you’ll see someone whom I thought was named Betty making a mountain out of a molehill. We really should return to that Formula1 discussion, it was productive. Our latest discussions about street race results would prove interesting.
Ya did good kid, ya did good, now trim the fat...