Oh, so you and the book guy are only referring to these 19 people only, not the tens of thousands of other credible people that claimed to have seen these objects. And all 19 saw military craft. OK.
***You seem to have a problem with perception. I am referring to those 19 people, and you have used that as an opportunity for straw argumentation to extend it to EVERY flying saucer case, EVER. You wouldn’t know if “the book guy” is referring to one or the other, so you’ll need to put your argument from silence on hold until you read the book.
And here I thought you and your book guy had an explanation for all these other sightings over the years,
***You really have a fixation on straw argumentation. What is it that compels you to argue against something that you have never read? You don’t even know what the book says. Read it.
and were implying that all these sightings were military craft, when in fact they could very well be something else.
***Yes that is what I imply, and will stick with that contention until you educate yourself and read the book.
I can go with that.
***You’re just looking for a place to argue rather than come up to speed. Stop proceeding from ignorance. Read the book.
Thanks Kev. You're a barrel of laughs. I mean it. I'll run out and purchase the book right away. Back in a few.
:o