You have a real interesting way of arguing from silence. You don’t even know what the book says but you argue against it. That’s the classical logical fallacy of arguing from silence.
Let’s see what other fallacies you’ve employed.
[You’ve got to be joking] — ridicule, playing to the gallery.
[So he has *evidence* that every] — exaggerate the other position and argue against it, straw argument fallacy.
[I say your book guy is full of crap, because he thinks he knows exactly what tens of thousand of all types of people have claimed to have seen,] — again straw argument, because that is not the original claim.
Keep them coming, this is fun.
Hmmm...Lets go through what you've forgotten you've already stated about what your book guy claims...
You said:
Time for a dose of simple reality. These are man-made military craft.
You stated he has ***evidence*** that every unidentified object, that every pilot, engineer, military personnel, cop etc has ever seen, and continue to see is in reality secret military aircraft? Lets see, once again, I say your book guy is full of crap, because he thinks he knows exactly what tens of thousand of all types of people have claimed to have seen, yet you allege I am closed minded?
And if they are not secret military aircraft, what are they?