Don’t recall
asserting anything about you being a shill.
I did note cheekiness.
And I noted that usually those are the characters
on these threads who display such cheekiness.
I don’t know if the shoe fits, or not.
But the observation is an accurate one.
It’s a bit interesting that some have emailed me noting that if they responded authenticly according to what they’d like to say to you . . . they’d get banned.
Your postings have generated that sort of feeling in others.
Of course, you are welcome to consider yourself as saintly as you wish.
Don’t recall asserting anything about you being a shill. I did note cheekiness. And I noted that usually those are the characters on these threads who display such cheekiness. I don’t know if the shoe fits, or not. But the observation is an accurate one.
***There you go again.
It’s a bit interesting that some have emailed me noting that if they responded authenticly according to what they’d like to say to you . . . they’d get banned.
***Interesting. There does appear to be a bunch of people who would rather go on endlessly speculating about stuff with little evidence than to discuss the evidence. There hopefully will be some among them who still have an open mind and will purchase that $5 book “Intercept UFO” by Renato Vesco and we can begin a dialog based upon facts rather than someone preferring to hide in shadows.
Your postings have generated that sort of feeling in others. Of course, you are welcome to consider yourself as saintly as you wish.
***Why thank you for that permission.