Thought it was a good book worth reading.
***Good to know. As other readers can see, even Quix, who disagrees with the conclusions, thought it was “a good book worth reading.” So it’s not like I’m making people spin their wheels.
Did not believe then nor believe now that the UFO technologies were or are 100% human in origin.
***Why? How did you arrive at this belief?
I recognize that you are a TRUE BELIEVER in virtually every sense of the word in that hypothesis/assertion. I’m not.
***Why again? How again?
I gave the book away years ago.
I have already asserted my relative as a source.
And, I’ve asserted that the highest ranking folks who’ve gone on the record over the years have asserted such.
I don’t have any great need to go into any greater detail. Those experts and direct experiencers had far more info at their fingertips than all my collection of puzzle pieces . . . or yours . . . and in some cases, or Vesco’s.
At some point, one trusts certain sources to a certain minimal degree or one doesn’t.
My PhD in clinical psychology has aided my screening of sources in terms of believability. But it hasn’t greatly altered the conclusions. It helps to have had a profession in which assessing truthfulness has been a key part of one’s professional effectiveness. But one is not flawless regardless of how near so training, experience, diversity of personalities and age may have helped one become.
Nevertheless, I’m comfortable with my conclusions at this point. Much has to be put on the shelf as hypotheses awaiting real time events in the not too distant future in which such technologies and critters will be foisted on the world stage very overtly in behalf of the establishment of the global government.
There are increasing rumblings of such getting closer and closer and louder and louder as well as more detailed in their “disclosures.” We shall see.
BTW, do you own any dog(s)?