Skip to comments.
New Way To Count Radio Listeners May Cut Ad Income (Minorities Have Been Way Overestimated)
NYT ^
| 12 NOV07
| Brian Seltzer
Posted on 11/12/2007 5:26:08 AM PST by MindBender26
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
This will cause huge cut in ad revenues in this very liberal segment of the broadcasting market.
No listeners? No ads dollars. (Ala Air America)
RIP
To: MindBender26
2
posted on
11/12/2007 5:33:30 AM PST
by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!" -- Jim Robinson, 09/30/07)
To: MindBender26
So minorities either were less accurate in their estimates of listening time for particular stations or lied. Wierd result that their would be a difference between minorities and whites on that.
3
posted on
11/12/2007 5:34:54 AM PST
by
Greg F
(Duncan Hunter is a good man.)
To: Greg F
So minorities either were less accurate in their estimates of listening time for particular stations or lied. Wierd result that their would be a difference between minorities and whites on that.I think it's just as likely that the people doing the tallying were fudging the numbers in the name of "diversity". Or perhaps both, explaining the large drop for some stations.
4
posted on
11/12/2007 5:48:44 AM PST
by
Jotmo
(I Had a Bad Experience With the CIA and Now I'm Gonna Show You My Feminine Side - Swirling Eddies)
To: MindBender26
Accurate rating system developed. Women and children hardest hit...
5
posted on
11/12/2007 6:03:50 AM PST
by
gridlock
(Recycling is the new Religion.)
To: MindBender26; holdonnow
Yes but Mark Levin’s ratings are way up with this new method!
6
posted on
11/12/2007 6:04:37 AM PST
by
Incorrigible
(If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
To: gridlock
Sorry, Women and minorities hardest hit... I left my New York Times template in my other coat...
7
posted on
11/12/2007 6:06:33 AM PST
by
gridlock
(Recycling is the new Religion.)
To: MindBender26
I imagine Congress will be wanting to take a look at this.
To: Incorrigible
Yes but Mark Levins ratings are way up with this new method! Well, the new methodology measures personal exposure to the broadcast. Since Mark Levin's voice can cut through sheetrock, lumber and steel, one radio tuned to his program can expose an entire apartment block!
9
posted on
11/12/2007 6:08:10 AM PST
by
gridlock
(Recycling is the new Religion.)
To: Steely Tom
Before or after they look into steroids in baseball and lifestyles of the rich and famous preachers?
10
posted on
11/12/2007 6:09:14 AM PST
by
winodog
( Coming Attractions: They cant legislate morality but can legislate hate)
To: MindBender26
Another possible title would have been, “Minority businesses to pay less to advertise; profits to rise.” But noooo, that would be too positive.
To: Grampa Dave; Liz; Ernest_at_the_Beach
causing considerable consternation among station owners and programmers.
12
posted on
11/12/2007 6:10:47 AM PST
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: Jotmo
I think it's just as likely that the people doing the tallying were fudging the numbers in the name of "diversity". Or perhaps both, explaining the large drop for some stations. That makes more sense.
13
posted on
11/12/2007 6:13:26 AM PST
by
Greg F
(Duncan Hunter is a good man.)
To: Larry Lucido
“Minority businesses to pay less to advertise; profits to rise. But noooo, that would be too positive.
___________________
You are right!
14
posted on
11/12/2007 6:14:13 AM PST
by
Greg F
(Duncan Hunter is a good man.)
To: Steely Tom
Congress will insist that they implement a “progressive” rating system where the disadvantaged listeners are weighted more in calculating Arbitron numbers.
15
posted on
11/12/2007 6:15:27 AM PST
by
listenhillary
(You get more of what you focus on)
To: Larry Lucido
Another possible title would have been, Minority businesses to pay less to advertise; profits to rise. But noooo, that would be too positive. In any news outlet, the way a story effects a media company will be, by far, the most important thing. It is like when a rancher hears a cow was hit by a truck, he is more likely to be concerned about the cow than the driver.
But you are right. This story means that minority businesses have been overcharged for advertising for years. That is the real scandal, here.
16
posted on
11/12/2007 6:42:22 AM PST
by
gridlock
(Recycling is the new Religion.)
To: gridlock
Women and MINORITIES hit hardest.
17
posted on
11/12/2007 6:44:23 AM PST
by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: listenhillary
Previously, Arbitron had used paper diaries from sample listeners to determine ratings that were used to set prices for advertising. Under pressure to provide more detailed and accurate data, Arbitron has gradually swapped human memory for computer technology, in the form of pocket-size devices that detect radio frequencies to automatically determine which station is on.So, now that there is an accurate way to measure listeners, the minorities want to go back to the "paper ballot". Does this sound familiar?
18
posted on
11/12/2007 6:46:59 AM PST
by
USS Alaska
(Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
To: MindBender26
"The change led to an intense lobbying effort by networks and some black leaders to postpone the widespread introduction of the new ratings system"
Reminds me of back in the early 1980's when gays made an intense lobbing effort to squash information about the outbreak of Aids and how it would adversely affect public perception of gays. Meanwhile, millions got death sentences.
Witholding info is never a good thing in a free society!
19
posted on
11/12/2007 6:49:39 AM PST
by
moonman
To: USS Alaska
I want to go back to electronic voting with back up paper ballots. Optically scanned paper ballots with the ballots kept on file.
I don’t know if any minorities want to go back to the paper ballot, but I KNOW air America does. Does air America have any minority on air talent?
20
posted on
11/12/2007 6:53:32 AM PST
by
listenhillary
(You get more of what you focus on)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson