Posted on 11/11/2007 2:49:12 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- Intel Corp. plans to roll out its newest generation of processors Monday, flexing its manufacturing muscle with a sophisticated new process that crams up to 40 percent more transistors onto the company's chips.
The world's largest semiconductor company expects to start shipping 16 new microprocessors -- which also boast inventive new materials to stanch electricity loss -- for use in servers and high-end gaming PCs .
The most complex chips being launched Monday have 820 million transistors, compared with the 582 million transistors on the same chips built using the current standard technology. Intel's first chips, introduced in the early 1970s, had just 2,300 transistors.
Advances in chip technology occur as smaller and smaller lines are etched onto the chips. Intel's new chips shrink the width of those lines to an average of 45 nanometers, or 45 billionths of a meter, compared to 65 nanometers on the previous generation of chips .
The smaller circuitry allows Intel to squeeze more transistors -- the building blocks of computer chips -- onto the same slice of silicon. That accelerates performance and drives down manufacturing costs.
The transistors on the new chips are so small that more than 30 million of them can fit onto the head of a pin. Performance zooms ahead with smaller transistors because more of them are available, they twitch faster to process data and less energy is required to power them.
Perhaps more importantly, the transistors on the Santa Clara-based company's new chips are built with new materials that help solve the critical problem of electricity loss as the circuitry gets smaller and smaller.
As electricity escapes from the chip, more power is needed to fuel its operations, leading to shorter battery life in laptop computers or higher electricity costs to run the machines.
"This is more than just a new process shrink," Tom Kilroy, general manager of Intel's Digital Enterprise Group, said. "Forty-five nanometers is wonderful and we get an uplift, but it really is the reinvention of the transistor."
Intel, which plans to spend up to $8 billion on upgrading or building factories for the 45-nanometer chips, is at least six months ahead of smaller rival Advanced Micro Devices Inc. in moving to the new technology.
Intel plans to launch new chips designed for mainstream desktop and laptop computers in the first quarter of 2008. Sunnyvale-based AMD, which partners with IBM Corp. on chip-making technology, is targeting mid-2008 to start selling its 45-nanometer chips.
AMD has long maintained that its chips have certain design advantages that keep them competitive with Intel's best offerings. One of those features is an integrated memory controller, which AMD has long championed.
Intel only said recently it would begin incorporating the controllers into future generations of chips.
"When you get myopic on the focus on the nanometers in the CPU, you can lose focus on the entire solution," said AMD spokesman John Taylor.
Intel's launch Monday includes server chips with frequencies of 2 gigahertz to 3.20 gigahertz for the quad-core models, which have four processing engines. The clock speed for dual-core models, which have two processing engines, goes up to 3.40 gigahertz. The measurements refer to the chips' processing cycles, or how fast they can process information.
The server chips will sell for $177 to $1279 in quantities of 1,000. The gaming chip will cost $999 in quantities of 1,000. Intel said all the processors would be available within 45 days.
No need to upgrade, these chips are for servers and there would never be a need to use one of these at home. (Or is that just an echo from long ago that I hear again?)
Who did Intel steal from this time?
I’m inclined to remember a few lines I’ve heard
“One megabyte of video memory for all your gaming needs”
and “800 megabytes of hard drive space?? You’ll never use that much”
The last two lines of the article mention a gaming cpu for $999.
Only 3.4 gigahertz seems slow to me. I thought they woulda been up to 5ish gigahertz by now.
Hahahahaha! I don't know what is funnier, the MSM writing about technology, or them writing about firearms.
My desktop computer bit the dust recently, and I’ve been wondering whether to replace it now.
Top of the line is usually too expensive. But Dell now is selling desktops with dual core Intels, and the prices are pretty decent.
Servers only...where have I heard that before...heh. Yep, guarantee that within a year, that will be the standard for personal computers... Hey, we have to play all those sophisticated games ya know...
Servers will be even more powerful...
The Future!
What continues to amaze me is how far Intel has managed to push what in many regards is truly a horrible architecture. Not that the 8086 didn’t solve some problems better than other 16-bit chips that have come since, but the 8-bit granularity of instruction sizes combined with the massive collection of prefixes must surely increase the required complexity.
BTW, one thing I’d like to see in a CPU architecture would be hardware for a 32+32 bit pointer (handle+offset) type. Such a type would make it much easier to generate high-performance applications while avoiding the dreaded “buffer overrun” errors.
i want intel to design a chip so powerful that it can project hollograms on my deskstop the way Princess Leah showed up in Star Wars...askin Obi Wan for help. She’s a babe and i for one would not mind her hangin around on my desktop...i might invite Brookie Shields to, oh and Kirsten Dunst and Kate Hudson would be nice....
The took their last ideas from the Digital Alpha chip. I guess you missed that story.
Didn’t miss a thing. If the ideas were all so great, why did DEC go under? Seems to me that Intel uses good ideas that are good, and also throws in their own innovations from time to time too.
Did Intel “steal” x64 from AMD? Or did they observe that AMD’s approach was necessary in a desktop chip after seeing AMD’s success with it, and fold the technology into the architecture?
http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&Description=allendale&bop=And&Order=PRICE
Above are Intel’s Allendale dual core processors. These are Intel’s least expensive dual cores
Dell refurbished-—>>>
http://outlet.us.dell.com/ARBOnlineSales/topics/global.aspx/arb/online/en/InventorySearch?c=us&cs=28&l=en&s=dfb
Phenom cannot come soon enough...
Digial went under from bad management. Intel violated 10 patents little boy. They lost the court cast. What did you miss this history because you were still crapping yourself?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.