You mean this? Sarcasm...
We’re going to “roll back decades of federal government largesse” by electing Hillary. Makes about as much sense.
~~~~~~
I would take Ron Paul any day over Hillary. But if wishes were gold, I’d be retired now and out on my fishing boat.
Putting all of this energy in to Ron Paul does nothing to prevent a Hillary president. That is MY opinion. I’m sure Ron Paul’s followers have another opinion.
Ron Paul is unelectable in a presidential contest. You are moving mountains with coke spoons. It comes right right out of Hillary’s playbook. Divide, splinter, shave off factions and play them against each other.
You will notice that Nader isn’t getting any serious support this time?
I notice that "reducing the size of the federal government" isn't getting any support.
Thanks for your reply.
But your statement above is really a non-starter, because, quite frankly, putting all of this energy into any current Republican candidate does nothing to prevent a Hillary presidency. Hillary is going to win or lose the Democrat nomination no matter what candidate wins the Republican nomination; the two processes are wholly separate, and are participated in only by the partisans of each party. And after eight years of Republican rule under George W. Bush, the most unpopular president since Richard Nixon, 2008 is really the Democrat's election to lose. This, of course, does not make me happy, but we must be realistic.