If Republicans want a nominee selected and funded by voters who normally support leftist Democrats, Ron Paul is your guy...
But if Republicans want a Republican nominated by Republicans to run against Hillary, it's time to put an end to the Ron Paul campaign...
Thanks, fascinating article.
If leftists are stupid enough to give their money to a small-government candidate, that’s something to celebrate, not lament.
Well, then, there's the problem that needs fixing....
Paul takes votes away from second tier or fringe candidates like Tancredo or Hunter or Brownback, rather than from the front-runners.
If Reagan were alive and in the race, Ron Paul wouldn't win over many of his supporters.
I'm not even sure that he hurts Thompson.
If he doesn't hurt Giuliani or McCain or Romney it's because they're in front, not because they're liberal.
I don’t know if anyone has pointed this out but as I post videos frequently on youtube under the name “DrArbitrage” and I view other’s vids, I have noticed that Ron Paul followers dominate the Hades out of that place and post comments on every single video relevant to politics (including every one of mine).
What I saw that caught my interest were notes to Dems when the particular state deadlines were for them to SWITCH their party affiliation to Republican so they could vote for “Dr. Paul”. I haven’t seen anything in the media about this but it would be an interesting expose’.
Who know how many of these “anarchist”/Marxists have registered as Republicans. Anyone have knowledge on whether there have been substantial pchanges in party affiliation?