[SoConPubbie]

"No it says what the article says, that Robertson is pragmatic."

I would disagree with you.

It says that Robertson was willing to compromise his most sacred principles to back a man that he believes (on little or no credible evidence) can win the nomination.

Mind you Rudy has no experience in foreign affairs and cannot poll above 25% with Most Likely Voters (See Rassmussen), and is guarenteed to split the base and hand the election to Hillary.

So with that all being said, it would also lead the intelligent voter to the conclusion that Robertson is also senile or losing his mind!

[angkor]

So with that all being said, it would also lead the intelligent voter to the conclusion that Robertson is also senile or losing his mind!

It leads this intelligent voter to the conclusion that Robertson is properly concerned that Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, Haifa, and Bombay (Mumbai) might become craters by 2012 if we don't get a president who sees the obscene gravity of Arab Muslim (Wahabbi, al Qaeda, Taliban, Qutub) threat and is prepared to take serious preventative measures.

He's doing what 90 percent of Social Conservatives and Values Voters seem incapable or unwilling to do, which is to put things in proper perspective.

I guess he's figured that we don't presently have the luxury of voting for a Bishop.