Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nathan Zachary
You know, there was always something about nuclear artillery that was troubling to me. The idea of a huge chemical explosion (all those Gs) to propel a nuclear device... well... I’m just saying I wouldn’t volunteer to be on the crew.
59 posted on 11/10/2007 3:42:34 PM PST by zencat (The universe is not what it appears, nor is it something else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: zencat
The artillery shells aren't any heavier than conventional ones. They were made to be fired from existing artillery guns.

Because the yield was typically far below one kt, from 22t- 75t, there was no danger from a blast wave from targets a mile away or so.
You'd want to be a little further away from anything with a yield beyond one or two kt though.

63 posted on 11/10/2007 3:50:54 PM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson