Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Truth on Trade (It's Boosting U.S. Incomes)
Cato via New York Post ^ | November 7, 2007 | Daniel Griswold

Posted on 11/10/2007 10:03:26 AM PST by 1rudeboy

Daniel Griswold directs the Cato Institute's Center for Trade Policy Studies and authored the new study, "Trading Up: How Expanding Trade Has Delivered Better Jobs and Higher Living Standards for American Workers," available at freetrade.org.

President Bush urged Congress yesterday to pass four pending trade agreements, telling a White House audience that open markets boost economic growth, raise standards of living by creating higher-paying jobs and deliver more choice and better prices for consumers. Despite claims to the contrary by populist opponents of trade expansion, the president has the facts and decades of experience on his side.

Critics of trade counter that real wages have stagnated while the middle class has been squeezed by a loss of jobs to low-wage competitors such as China and Mexico. Democrats in Congress point to those anxieties to justify their opposition to any meaningful trade-expanding legislation — including pending free trade accords with South Korea and Colombia and renewal of presidential trade-promotion authority.

Like so many assumptions about trade, the belief that more global competition has somehow lowered the living standards of the average American worker and family is just a myth.

The critics have it all wrong: The middle class isn't disappearing — it's moving up.

The Census reports that the share of U.S. households earning $35,000 to $75,000 a year (in '06 dollars) — roughly, the middle class — has indeed shrunk slightly over the last decade, from 34 percent to 33 percent. But so, too, has the share earning less than $35,000 — from 40 percent to 37 percent.

It's the share of households earning more than $75,000 that's jumped — from 26 percent to 30 percent.

Trade has helped America transform itself into a middle-class service economy. Yes, the country's lost a net 3.3 million manufacturing jobs . . .

(Excerpt) Read more at freetrade.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cafta; cato; nafta; trade; wto
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last
To: mysterio
We’re doooooomed!
61 posted on 11/12/2007 8:13:15 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (What came first, the bad math or the goldbuggery?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

lol


62 posted on 11/12/2007 8:13:37 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: WilliamofCarmichael
Here's a recent article related to your question(s):

Movin' On Up (A Treasury study refutes populist hokum about "income inequality.") [Free Republic]

The entire, unexcerpted piece is worth a read.
63 posted on 11/13/2007 5:57:47 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

Read-through my link above, and shed those tears you are so fond of shedding.


64 posted on 11/13/2007 5:59:45 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson