Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gondramB

What’s really too bad about that is that the “delay” in the announcement to the media about the size of the spill was a totally unacceptable five hours.

Five hours?

This is reason for outrage?

The gear was there and the cleanup was underway. Maybe they were busy getting real response going instead of chatting with reporters, who so far as I know, aren’t cleaning up anything.

Five hours is too long to let the *reporters* wait? How do they say that with a straight face?


43 posted on 11/09/2007 7:19:06 PM PST by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Ramius

>>Five hours is too long to let the *reporters* wait? How do they say that with a straight face?<<

Are they claiming there are any consequences for the delay?

I’m guessing that the Coast Guard talked to California officials much faster.


44 posted on 11/10/2007 3:16:13 AM PST by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson