Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: steve-b
No problem at all. I simply make my case to the jury and ask them what they would have done.

It’s like a case I had in law school. Man was cited for 115 in a 55 zone. Good car, empty open road. We established he was taking wife, who was in labor, to the delivery room at hospital.

State said “There are no exceptions.”

I argued “any port in a storm” but made the most points by asking the jury members, with their wife screaming in labor in the seat next to them, what would they have done?

Got a NG in 7 minutes.

179 posted on 11/09/2007 8:05:45 AM PST by MindBender26 (Having my own CAR-15 in Vietnam meant never having to say I was sorry......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: MindBender26
OK; the whole point of jury nullification is a recognition that under unusual conditions a specific flouting of the law may be excusable.

That is not a reason to abandon upholding the rule of law as a general policy.

209 posted on 11/09/2007 8:27:47 AM PST by steve-b (Sin lies only in hurting others unnecessarily. All other "sins" are invented nonsense. --RAH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson