Posted on 11/09/2007 6:14:39 AM PST by RDTF
I will say that since I do not consider it torture, I consider it to be a valid and acceptable method of interrogation, however due to other factors beyond the fact that it is not torture, I would like to see the use of it restricted as much as possible. Since the current policy seems to be to restrict the use of waterboarding altogether, but the insistence that it is not torture preserves the possibility of future use, if necessary, I am satisfied with the status quo.
Is that good enough, or are we gonna have to fight all night?
Yes, and they’re paving a road to hell with all their good intentions for the survival of their societies.
Good work Sherlock. That is always a red flag in my book.
The itch for regime change in Iraq was documented long before 9/11.
Seems that its hurt Bush a lot more than its helped him the last few years.
There's no law that says presidents can't self-destruct.
Mankind must deal with the real world. We cannot survive on platitudes, slogans, and concepts.
That said, his casual reference in another article attributed to him about being swiftboated sent up a red flag with me.
Good work Sherlock. That is always a red flag in my book.
Thanks....I think....(chuckle)
We can absolutely survive on concepts. If you disagree, then we’re done here.
It's my understanding it doesn't cause pain. Extreme discomfort and panic.....but not pain.
Our sessions were always supervised by an doctor just in case. I suspect that's the case with it's employment today.
The psychological effect would be tougher to gauge. Anyone who's been there would not want to do it again...ever. I also suspect those who administer it have the same position.
You hear the same thing from them when we drop bombs and some children die.
These people are moral equivalent people. They see no differenc in Hitler bombing London and us bombing Japan. We're all baby killers, donchano.
Really? I’ve heard different. If that’s waterboarding being performed improperly, ok. But it still is in violation of the above quoted code defining torture when it is being performed properly, by your description.
Got it. It all depends what the meaning of "is" is.
But we do follow the Geneva Convention. Does the Geneva Convention outlaw waterboarding? I don't think so.
By this logic all coersive methods are a waste of time.
If waterboarding doesn't work we wouldn't use it. Since we use it ...I can only conclude that it in fact does work.
You're right. It's not torture.
But it ain't a tea party, either.
Waterboarding should not be called torture.
Torture has a legal meaning and if we say it is legally torture it would place our people from Bush on down in legal jeopardy for war crimes.
Waterboarding is probably the most effective method of interrogation IMO.
If you know of a more effective method I'm all ears.
These help explain the unlawful/unprivileged combatant issue, the use of torture or coercion, and many other related matters.Geneva Conventions - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Torture - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Unlawful combatant - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Context is important.
Reread my post.
I SAID: At the point in time terrorist acts threaten our national survival.
You changed the meaning of my post.
So, what is the background on this? To whom (if anyone) does this fellow give his political donations to?So his donations, if any, mean he's not entitled to a respected opinion? His experience lends weight to his opinion. How much weight you give it is up to you.
Id say that the question is far more relevant when facing a civilized enemy than an un-civilized enemy. Our enemies have no rules and consider us to be less than animals.I'm trying to remember which rules of civilized warfare Germany and Japan respected. They chopped of heads, gassed people, and used chemical warfare on entire cities in China. All as a matter of government policy. Doesn't sound to civilized to me.
We still beat them without having to stoop to the same level of barbarity.
Firebombing Germany and the Atomic bomb were as close as we came. Both were inflicted on people who we had no control of and legitimate military targets.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.