Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tx_eggman; All
Build the wall, yes, but build it on the freakin border.

The fence through this area will mostly be built atop of existing levees, which is the logical place to put it. The river meanders wildly through this area and to put the fence directly on the river would increase the fence's length at least three fold. Also if the fence were built along the river you have to figure in the additional cost that building it across every creek, arroyo and gully would add.

31 posted on 11/09/2007 5:20:45 AM PST by Between the Lines (I am very cognizant of my fallibility, sinfulness, and other limitations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Between the Lines

“The fence through this area will mostly be built atop of existing levees, which is the logical place to put it. The river meanders wildly through this area and to put the fence directly on the river would increase the fence’s length at least three fold. Also if the fence were built along the river you have to figure in the additional cost that building it across every creek, arroyo and gully would add.”

If the cost is more than the cost of reimbursing these people for their lost land then pay them and do it. If not then build it on he river.


64 posted on 11/09/2007 7:06:17 AM PST by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson