Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ElkGroveDan
“For this to work they will need 2/3 of both Houses, and they don’t have it and never will in the near future.”

This is the old plan that they have abandoned. They are aiming for putting this on the Nov., 2008 ballot which takes the legislature out of it. All they need is for the amendment to pass and the tax is in. This is the best environment they’ve ever had to push this through. I’m not worried yet as I have a small amount of faith left that we will once again vote this garbage down. The problems will start to become clear as they are forced to deal with the details and how all this will be implemented. Wait until they have to agree on the type of coverage offered in the so called pool. Little things like employees who have access to group insurance but with say a $80 per month employee contribution but who are also eligible for the pool. The list goes on.

9 posted on 11/08/2007 7:55:36 PM PST by Bogeygolfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Bogeygolfer
This is the old plan that they have abandoned. They are aiming for putting this on the Nov., 2008 ballot which takes the legislature out of it.

If they are involving the Governor then that means they are looking to put it on the ballot legislatively with an SCA or ACA. In that case, they WILL need 2/3 of both houses which again, they don't have and won't have any time soon. If they were thinking about trying to qualify it with signatures, then there would be no "negotiations". They'd just draft it however they pleased.

10 posted on 11/08/2007 10:33:09 PM PST by ElkGroveDan (If Rudy's an influential conservative, then I'm an award winning concert pianist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson