Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fluffdaddy
If the unborn had the full protection of persons under the 14th Amendment, equal protection would require that killing them be treated as intentional homicide, in other words as a serious crime. We send people to jail for serious crimes. No distinction between abortionists and the women who pay them would be sustainable. You couldn’t punish the former and not the latter any more than you could punish the hit man but not the Mafia Don who hired him.

Sometimes I despair of the pro-life movement. Victory is close at hand, but many pro-lifers seem too childish to grasp it.

They will only vote for someone who will advocate the impossible. They demand that the first step be one that is not going to be taken in this country.

Rather than looking at the big picture, and the overturning of Roe V Wade as the important first step in that big picture, they'd rather hold their breath and demand instant gratification.

97 posted on 11/08/2007 4:20:03 AM PST by samtheman (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: samtheman

nobody is against overturning roe v wade. but first you have to have nominees that don’t end up like souter and they also have to be approved by a pro-life senate.
Now, how do you get a pro-life senate? well you have this big national movement for federal legislation that these senators can vote for and pro-lifers will be energized to elect them.


102 posted on 11/08/2007 4:40:55 AM PST by ari-freedom (I am for traditional moral values, a strong national defense, and free markets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson