“You would have to change 20 to 25 votes in the Senate,” says Osteen. “You’d have to replace 20 to 25 senators to pass an amendment even there. It takes two-thirds of both houses of Congress [and] three-fourths of the states to ratify [an amendment to the Constitutional], so it’s not practical to think that there would be a human life amendment passing Congress during the next presidential term — and of course, the president doesn’t have a vote.”
So the plan here is to attack Fred for something that won't be accomplished in the foreseeable future AND is out of his hands anyway, and all in support of a slippery governor of a liberal state with a 35 year pro-abortion history AND a convenient Road to Ames conversion.
THAT is the definition of sleazy.
Let’s see the Mitt folks try and leverage the really staunch Pro Lifers against Fred, then screw them over later because our guy has been solidly pro life BOTH in word AND deed for about 24 months longer than he has been an NRA member...
The Romneyites have a huge problem.
Mitt is more like Rudy than anyother candidate running for the GOP nomination. Neither man is a conservative. Rudy is the anti-conservative and can’t be trusted. While Romney`s never given one good reason for conservatives to trust him.
If you are a conservative and you care about the future of the GOP, accepting either Mitt or Rudy as the nominee is going to take a huge leap of faith. I’m not ready for either one and probably never will be.
Go Fred go!