No doubt Rush will report this if nobody else does.
The sad thing is that everything we need to refute global warming, we learned in junior high science class:
a) 2/3rds of the earth is covered by...water!
b) when water heats, steam rises into the atmosphere!
c) when water in the atmosphere cools, it forms clouds!
d) clouds cool the surface temperature and, under the right circumstances, brings precipitation!
e) that precipitation replenishes the water supply and serves to regulate the temperature on the earth’s surface!
f) and 2/3rds of the earth’s surface is covered by water so God has provided an enormous temperature regulating system for us (as it were) to prevent the planet from getting too hot or too cold!
g) this system has been in place for a lot longer than man has and will still be there long after man has died off!
ISN’T GOD WONDERFUL??
Now, subtle regional climate changes may take place over time but they aren’t caused by mankind driving cars or using incandescent light bulbs. Man is far too miniscule in relation to the planet to affect change.
I suppose if Mutual Assured Destruction were to take place on a global scale, we might just be able to alter the planet significantly to bring about global catastrophe but, if that happens, you’ll know it sooner than within 50 years and you won’t give a crap then whether you were driving a hybrid or recycling compost.
Don’t be trickin folk, using all that factual gobblity gook.
Forests are dyin, little girls in Alaska are cryin, and pretty soon the whole world will be fryin...
Save us Algore...
Very well stated!! I have a Masters degree in Biology and I agree 100% with you. I teach a General Biology course for non-majors in our local community college and I try at least to let my students know that the theory of GW has just as many adversaries as proponents. Our Administration frowns on our talking about anything political in class, but I always use the “GW consensus” as an example when I am talking about the scientific method. I emphasize that they need to examine the evidence and draw their own conclusions rather than blindly believing whatever they hear or read in the MSM.
Very well stated!! I have a Masters degree in Biology and I agree 100% with you. I teach a General Biology course for non-majors in our local community college and I try at least to let my students know that the theory of GW has just as many adversaries as proponents. Our Administration frowns on our talking about anything political in class, but I always use the “GW consensus” as an example when I am talking about the scientific method. I emphasize that they need to examine the evidence and draw their own conclusions rather than blindly believing whatever they hear or read in the MSM.
LOL! Very true.