Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tailgunner Joe

Uh, let’s see here...

1. FRed was an unmarried very young expectant father, who did not cause his child to be aborted, as many did in that same situation.

2. His voting record is 100% Pro Life.

3. He has said, many, many times, “I have always—and that’s been my position the entire time I’ve been in politics. I thought Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided”

4. He said again on MTP...”I think Roe v. Wade hopefully one day will be overturned...to have a constitutional amendment to do that, I do not think would be the way to go.”

5. And again, “my legal record is there, and that’s the way I would govern if I was president. I would take those same positions. No federal funding for abortion,”

6. “I think life begins at conception. I always—it was abstract to me before. I was a father earlier when I was very young. I was busy. I went about my way.”

So, now, why don’t YOU show where FRed said he was for abortion?


100 posted on 11/07/2007 8:37:00 PM PST by papasmurf (sudo apt - get install FRed Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: papasmurf
"I do not think it is a wise thing to criminalize young girls and perhaps their parents as aiders and abettors or perhaps their family physician." - Fred Thompson

"you can’t have a law that cuts off an age group or something like that, which potentially would take young, young girls in extreme situations and say, basically, we’re going to put them in jail to do that. I just don’t think that that’s the right thing to do." - Fred Thompson

109 posted on 11/07/2007 8:41:37 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson