Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my Viking Kitty/ZOT ping list!. . . don't be shy.
Posted on 11/07/2007 3:04:16 PM PST by TaxesR2High
Why would anyone give any credence to this incredible pile of horsecrap?
Good God, have mercy on JimRob’s bandwidth, eh?
He imagines the Holy Rollers are going to take over the world and ruin it.
Instead, we should all be more concerned with the fact that the Democrats are taking over the Virginia Senate and will raise taxes on cigarettes to build roads for wealthy Liberal neighborhoods full of leftwing lawyers.
If so it is amazing how you can ignore the amazing contradiction that presents... If you want Armageddon simply let everyone have nukes... That is the path to Armageddon... But to you trying to prevent that path is somehow being an Armageddonite...
And I find it interesting that because “now the whole world is against us” that somehow the rest of the world holds the moral high ground... That’s the same moral high ground that led to the death of a few hundred million in the last century... That “moral high ground” is based on not making their enemies mad because their enemies aren’t killing them at them moment, it is someone else doing all the dying...
If that’s is your view, you are morally bankrupt. Nothing further to discuss.
This is so bogus and is nothing more than a repetition of more anti-fundamentalist tripe.
It would be a good idea to repost this and place your comments in a response, rather than mixing your comments in with the writer’s.
Frankly, I find this whole piece to be offensive.
You say you added to it. Point those comments out instead of mixing it in.
That way we know which kook wrote what.
Well said.
And I agree, it is - all - offensive.
“This is so bogus and is nothing more than a repetition of more anti-fundamentalist tripe.”
Ditto
By the way. I guess I have a new title. I have never heard of an “Armageddonist”, but if the shoe fits...
LOL, yea, call me names and denounce ME as ‘morally bankrupt’...
Would you say it was morally bankrupt or even ‘kooky’ to give chemical weapons to a guy like Saddam in the first place?
Did Saddam need to go? Yea.
Did we need a whole army to do remove him from power? No.
So are we going to learn from our mistakes? Or are we just going to continue to assume that we can do no wrong, because by-golly we’re the U.S. darnit! What’s it going to be?
Iran’s nuclear ambitions...yea, that’s a pretty scary issue. Why aren’t we being more forceful on Russia? Why are we letting Russia help them acquire this nuclear technology? Does anyone have an answer?
Was it moral to allow the mess in Rwanda? Is it moral to allow the mess in Sudan? I’d like some serious answers if anyone has them.
And stop it already with the name-calling and put up a good debate for once.
Never have I seen so much ignorance displayed in one essay.
Tighten the tinfoil dude.
How does the author of this piece fit my agnosticism into my desires to bomb the crud out of Iran, tame Iraq; or support of Israel, erasing the fledgling “state” of Palestine (not the people), and expelling illegal immigrants?
The author is a brownshirt propagandist. Sieg Heil!
Why are you posting this crap?
Well, seeing that we DID NOT . . . .
(Virtual nickel to the first person that points out why we could not).
Fundamentalist Muslims want the final conflict to begin as well, to reveal the "Hidden Imam". They think that they're gonn'a win!
iatz
Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my Viking Kitty/ZOT ping list!. . . don't be shy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.