Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: caseinpoint

Yep. It’ll survive constitutional challenges, since there are already two states that do apportionment and if the voters amend the charter, there’s not much the courts can do (i.e., Proposition 13).

I notice that a similar measure in Colorado is supported by Democrats. I for one am tired of my vote not counting. It will be interesting in this next election if Hillary doesn’t carry California if the Demorats in Sacto will resurrect this issue.


10 posted on 11/07/2007 8:39:23 AM PST by Right Cal Gal (Remember Billy Dale!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Right Cal Gal

Apportionment is certainly legal. However, the Constitution specifically gives authority to the Legislatures of each state. What has not been decided is whether direct vote of the populace is the same as actions by the Legislature.


13 posted on 11/07/2007 8:53:36 AM PST by SmithL (I don't do Barf Alerts, you're old enough to read and decide for yourself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson