Skip to comments.
Surrounded by RINOs: RINOs to the Left of me and RINOs to the Right of me
FreeRepublic and others (links provided)
| 11.07.07
| FreeRepublic and others
Posted on 11/07/2007 7:29:57 AM PST by rface
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-127 next last
To: Romneyfor President2008
"POE...Purity of Essense...POE..." Have you ever seen a RINO drink a glass of water?
41
posted on
11/07/2007 7:50:18 AM PST
by
VR-21
(Leftists justify their existance by kicking their own country in the teeth.)
To: rface
Sure! Get Rid of everyone who disagrees with you, and then everything you say will be true!
To: rface
Hmmm.... Maybe a Republicrat party should be formed and fashioned for the moderates of both parties. It would be interesting to see if the far right and left could compete.
43
posted on
11/07/2007 7:52:33 AM PST
by
Realism
(Some believe that the facts-of-life are open to debate.....)
To: rface
“me and about 100 others.” Sounds about right.
44
posted on
11/07/2007 7:53:19 AM PST
by
fireforeffect
(A kind word and a 2x4, gets you more than just a kind word.)
To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
Bad vote, wrong move, which is why he isn’t to the very right on that chart. But you will be hard pressed to find any candidate that doesn’t have one or two bad votes. Even Duncan Hunter voted for the 527 provision of CFR.
45
posted on
11/07/2007 7:55:41 AM PST
by
mnehring
(Ron Paul is to the Constitution what Fred Phelps is to the Bible.)
To: HHKrepublican_2
Sure! Get Rid of everyone who disagrees with you, and then everything you say will be true!Sounds like a trick right out of Hillary's bag there.
To: rface
Actually, most Republicans realize that the most intractable rock-ribbed conservative candidate is NOT always the one who can win general elections.
I'm sure it pains you (and me also) to admit that the key to winning in 2008 is to pick the MOST conservative candidate as possible ... who also has the resources, the personality, the financial support, the likability, and the personal ethics to get 51-percent of the vote in the general election.
Unfortunately, the most conservative candidate does not always mean the best candidate.
It's really that simple.
There is a point, of course, for myself and for most Republicans that even the most likable Republican candidate is unacceptable ... if they betray too many conservative-GOP principals.
To me, Guliani falls in that camp.
Mitt Romney, on the other hand, supports and exudes many of the great conservative virtues that made the GOP a great patriotic party.
Is Romney perfect? No.
No candidate is perfect. (Reagan passed amnesty in 1986, and raised taxes in 1987, passed a pro-abortion plan in CA in 1967, and did nothing when the US Marines were attacked in Lebanon in 1983)
Still, many people see him as the ultimate conservative Republican candidate.
Thus it will be with Romney, I believe.
47
posted on
11/07/2007 7:57:26 AM PST
by
Edit35
To: rface
This thread is a perfect example of why the dimocRATS are going to win and the country will take a hard turn to the left. To many Republicans will sit out the election because their guy is not the nominee.
To: Realism
Hmmm.... Maybe a Republicrat party should be formed and fashioned for the moderates of both parties. It would be interesting to see if the far right and left could compete. That's pretty much what we have with the Republicans right now being 99% RINOS. Same goes with the old Democrats being taken over by the far left, someone like Zell Miller or Joe Lieberman would represent maybe 1% of what their party used to stand for.
To: rface
Because there are better "Conservatives" to pick from. Anybody able to even eke out 5% of the vote? Even if 100% of all FReepers were to support Hunter, he'd not even reach 4%.
Fred Thompson is not as 'perfect' as Duncan Hunter, but at least he has a shot at winning the nomination. He does NOT deserve to be on the same list with Rooty.
50
posted on
11/07/2007 8:01:20 AM PST
by
hunter112
(Change will happen when very good men are forced to do very bad things.)
To: Realism
Hmmm.... Maybe a Republicrat party should be formed and fashioned for the moderates of both parties. It would be interesting to see if the far right and left could compete.Yep, the Republican Party has been moving to the left for years now.
If you want to accelerate that movement to the left--so that we can FINALLY achieve the LIBERAL NIRVANA of TWO political parties BOTH to the left of center (while destroying what's left of the CONSERVATIVE IDENTITY of the Republican Party)...
a LIBERAL like Rudy is the RIGHT MAN AT THE RIGHT TIME!!!
51
posted on
11/07/2007 8:03:16 AM PST
by
stockstrader
(We need a conservative who will ENERGIZE the Party, not a liberal who will DEMORALIZE it!)
To: Rock&RollRepublican
There is a point, of course, for myself and for most Republicans that even the most likable Republican candidate is unacceptable ... if they betray too many conservative-GOP principals. To me, Guliani falls in that camp.
Mitt Romney, on the other hand, supports and exudes many of the great conservative virtues that made the GOP a great patriotic party.
I'd agree with most everything except the last paragraph. I think if you substitute Fred Thompson's name for Mitt Romney, we'd be in agreeance 100%. Can you tell me why you prefer Romney over Thompson? Romney seems to want to be all things to all people, and the last person running for president that sounded like was John F Kerry.
To: rface
53
posted on
11/07/2007 8:07:29 AM PST
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: rface
We are at War with the Democrats! RUMSFELD: "You have to go to war with the army you've got, not the one you want!"
Soldiers do not leave the battle field in a hissy fit while their brethren turn to corpses!
54
posted on
11/07/2007 8:09:18 AM PST
by
avacado
To: hunter112
I really hope before the Iowa Caucuses, Hunter can be a big enough man and realize he cannot win in 2008, and will team up and support Thompson, and be a part of his administration. If they form that kind of alliance now, most conservatives would jump on board, and then Romney, McCain would fall by the wayside. Leaving Rudy vs. Thompson/Hunter. Then it would be a Conservative vs. RINO and that would be great to see Rudy struggle to TRY to be more conservative even knowing it would be smoke and mirrors, and he would then realize he was running for the wrong party, and should have run as a Democrat.
To: mnehrling
56
posted on
11/07/2007 8:13:31 AM PST
by
wastedyears
(One Marine vs. 550 consultants. Sounds like good odds to me.)
To: rface
57
posted on
11/07/2007 8:15:18 AM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Greed is NOT a conservative ideal.)
To: mnehrling
Hunter voted for CFR? Oh, I’m going to have to look that up.
58
posted on
11/07/2007 8:19:32 AM PST
by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: Valin
I think we should purge everyone who doesnt agree with me 100% of the time
No Valin, we should purge anyone who doesn't agree with ME 100% of the time, lol!
To: wastedyears
Yes, Duncan is the furthest Right, but what is the chance that even if you convince ever Freeper he polls over 1%-2%? All we are doing is splitting up the conservatives so Rudy walks away with the pop-culture/war only votes. Fred is the most Conservative who is within striking distance of Rudy and can do the most damage if we actually do something crazy and unite.
60
posted on
11/07/2007 8:20:29 AM PST
by
mnehring
(Ron Paul is to the Constitution what Fred Phelps is to the Bible.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-127 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson