Nice Rhetoric, glad to see the skipping record continues.
Riddle me this Mr I define what is conservative.
Republicans held the congress for over 10 years, why did they not once put up legislation to remove abortion from the perview of the federal court?
Don’t lecture me about abortion, if what you define as “true conservatives” gave a damned about this issue it wouldn’t still be in the hands of the federal courts.
Congress has the constitutional right to remove ANY issue from the perview of the courts at will, period. And it never happened, and never will happen.
Rudy has stated he’ll nominate construtionalists, that’s hardly an advocation of radical abortion activist judges... Hitlery has said without apology no judge who does not support a womans right to commit infanticide with a doctors aid will be nominated. So, please explain to me how these are the same? If you think they are, there is no point in even continuing a discussion with you, because rational thought is not one of your strong points.
OK, Rudy's already gone on record saying that if folks embrace Roe as a precedent, "that's OK." Now, maybe you like to twist the English language alongside Rudy, but if mass murder isn't "radical" but is instead "OK" then you don't even have a compass point upon which to measure what he means by "constructionists." (For all we know, the rogue Roe judges were all "constructionists" to Rudy.)