Posted on 11/05/2007 8:42:27 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Many of those who support the ilegals also have sworn oaths to uphold the law. They should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
“The new poll found 77 percent of the adults surveyed opposed making driver’s licenses available to illegal aliens..”
Isn’t 77% considered a majority?
ping
Poll finds 77% oppose licenses for illegals (Hill-Spitzergate)....
the other 23% ARE illegals!!!
Eight of them were even registered to vote in American elections.
Under federal "motor voter" law, anyone receiving a driver's license automatically may register to vote.
Nothing but the "honesty" of illegal aliens prevents them from breaking one more law, and voting in American elections.
And Hillary Clinton thinks we should give driver's licenses to illegal aliens.
I wonder why?
QUISLING: a synonym for traitor, someone who collaborates with the invaders of his country.
Several years ago, there was a 5 county referendum in western PA regarding public funding for a new stadium. It was rejected by 65% of the voters.
Did the politicians care?
Hell no.
They just figured another way to steal public funds for a private enterprise.
If it doesn't affect their own personal power, they don't care what the "public wants".
Those terrorists registered to vote had an additional ID card—voter registration card—to make them look legitimate.
Voters know that licenses for illegals will lead to wide-scale vote fraud and devalue their votes. Republicans oppose it because they know it will make it very difficult to win an election. Democrats oppose it because they know that if illegals are allowed to vote, their party will become the party of illegals, and nobody will listen to their concerns.
The only people who stand to win are the Democrat politicians, who see this as a ticket to perpetual re-election. They are more than happy to sell out the country to secure their positions for life.
BUMP-TO-THE-TOP! Thanks for the ping, gubamyster. Thanks for posting, 2ndDivisionVet.
Good point!
If 66% is considered a "supermajority", then what, pray tell, would 77-80% be considered?
the infowarrior
“..what, pray tell, would 77-80% be considered?”
Hmmm, giga-majority?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.