Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pissant
Why is it “big government” to forward constitutional protections to the unborn? Are they human beings or not?

I guess a fair question would be does the Federal government have laws against any other type of murder? If they leave the traditional crime of murder to be adjucated by the states, it would make sense for murder by abortion to be handled by them as well.

BTW, I'm a Duncan Hunter supporter too, but Senator Thompson does have a point.

420 posted on 11/05/2007 12:42:09 PM PST by Retired COB (Still mad about Campaign Finance Reform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Retired COB

if a state decided to legalize, say the murder of jews or blacks, you better believe the federal govt will get involved.


423 posted on 11/05/2007 12:45:20 PM PST by ari-freedom (I am for traditional moral values, a strong national defense, and free markets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies ]

To: Retired COB

That is not a good analogy, IMO.

A better analogy would be if the Supremes ruled that retarded children are not afforded constitutional protections, and that states could not prosecute those who committed the executions of those kids.

How one would respond to that scenario is how we should be responding to this ongoing infantacide called abortion. IOTW, re-establish their constitutional right to life.


424 posted on 11/05/2007 12:47:03 PM PST by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson