That's the correct way to do it.
If a STATE decides to allow it, that is the WILL OF THE PEOPLE.
For those who are "pro-life", you may be disappointed in such a circumstance when the vote doesn't go in your favor (blue states). HOWEVER, you're subject to the provisions of the U.S. Constitution just like everyone else, and if the MAJORITY in your State vote FOR legalized abortion, you're stuck with it.
For the die-hards, who think the Constitution says "life" begins at the moment of conception, absent a USSC ruling that agrees, then you are bound by the State decision by the People.
FRed has it right.
If in fact the "majority" is offended by the position, they can vote against him. That does not mean he is wrong on the issue of States' Rights; it only means that the MAJORITY don't agree because they are mis-informed, or, as occurs on this thread, grasping at straws to promote their own candidate choice.
If a STATE decides to allow it, that is the WILL OF THE PEOPLE.
-
that’s the will of mob rule. The tyranny of the majority.