[PetroniusMaximus]

“None of the gospels were written by the apostle they are named after ... and were written by followers of the particular disciples, often many years later.”

That is certainly not the case. I can’t stand it when people pawn off liberal theories as if they were, for lack of a better term, gospel.

You would be well served to go back and study the source material more closely. And try to look up some scholars that aren’t as biased as the ones you’ve been reading.

[HonorInPa]

Don’t dare to call my comments liberal thinking. It is backed by solid archeology andr research. I suggest you read “What Paul Meant” by Garry Wills to have your eyes opened. Then write me back to discuss.

[ZULU]

“That is certainly not the case. I can’t stand it when people pawn off liberal theories as if they were, for lack of a better term, gospel.”

I don;t think its fair to categorize these theories as “liberal”. They aren;t even modern revisionist in the sense that is generally employed.