Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: airborne

I see even more problems with getting a constitutional amendment “done.” Which is why it wouldn’t really hurt Fred to support an amendment. It makes a crucial point and it’s very, very, very, very, very, very unlikely ever to pass. And if it ever came close, it would thereby give the states exactly the privilege he claims he wants to give them: they could then decide whether to ratify it.

No one’s asking him to put all his eggs in the amendment basket. He could support this and also support overturning R v W and giving the states authority to decide—he could support all three of them.

But that would be an extreme position, now, wouldn’t it. And Fred’s laid back and nuanced. Romney’s looking better all the time.


69 posted on 11/04/2007 2:22:50 PM PST by Dionysiusdecordealcis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Dionysiusdecordealcis
Which is why it wouldn’t really hurt Fred to support an amendment.

Are you advocating he should tailor his statements to get a certain reaction or to seem to mean something other than what he believes?
The fact is that Thompson is HONEST and STRAIGHTFORWARD. He doesn't waver and BS around. He answers questions and explains his answer.
He has a long, long pro-life record, and no amount of lies by posters on this board will change that.
146 posted on 11/04/2007 3:07:26 PM PST by visualops (artlife.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson