The only thing I disagree with is the idea that an HLA will "never happen." It could, well into the future (how many of us in, say, 1968 thought the Soviet Union would ever fall?), but the idea that the next president, or the next three, will have a chance to do anything about it is far fetched.
I appreciate the kind words. I too am reluctant to predict the HLA will never happen. I probably should have qualified it by saying “barring some divine intervention” or that it likely won’t happen for the next two or three Presidencies, as you point out. I am just tired of people like Huckabee dangling their ip service to the HLA as evidence of their prolife bona fides, instead of addressing the issue (anti-federalist, anti-consitutionalist judicial interpretation)that brought us Roe (and a lot of other bad jurisprudence) in the first place.