Replies

Oh ok, so he flip flopped.

I guess Mitt isn't the only one to do that. These things keep coming up (lobbying for abortion, lobbying for CFR) yet it is OK for Fred, but not for any other candidate.

Fred has a 100% Pro Life voting record, yet on Senate candidate worksheets he seemed to indicate that he was pro-choice, THAT WAS THEN, THIS IS NOW!

Fred was pro-choice on 1994 questionaires, pro-life in the Senate, apparently then switched back to pro-choice, because he admits that until he saw his baby's ultrasound (which was after he served in the Senate) that was when he realized that she really was a baby. but...THAT WAS THEN, THIS IS NOW!

Illegal immigration ....THAT WAS THEN, THIS IS NOW!

CFR...THAT WAS THEN,THIS IS NOW!

I get it, if Fred is states it, it is ok. Enjoy your mental gymnastics.

HEY MITT FANS, ALL YOU HAVE TO SAY TO SATISFY REAGAN MAN IS .....

THAT WAS THEN, THIS IS NOW!!!!!

Look, you asked me what I thought about Fred's amicus brief in support of CFR. I said, that was then and this is now. Meaning, the issue ad provision was relevant in 2003. Today, in 2008 its no longer a relevant issue. Nor is it a major issue for conservatives in the 2008 campaign. Its also not an issue on par with abortion either. As far as I know, Fred`s always been pro-life, with his federalist viewpoint opposing an amendment that would criminalize abortion. Fred said, he never thought of when life began. But once he saw the sonogram of his four year child prior to her birth, he changed his opinion. I don't have a problem with that. You do.

According to Mitt Romney, he had a total epiphany on the abortion issue. One day he supported RvW and abortion on demand as a Constitutional right, the next day he was pro-life. Sorry, I don't but it. Romney is well known for his use of political expediency on issues ranging from abortion, to gays to guns. He also supports nationalized health care. A very liberal position that even Giuliani is smart enough to stay away from.