Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CitizenUSA

>>>So, you’d make it a federal crime to intentionally terminate a new life for any reason at any time? That’s complete nonsense!<<<

Perhaps you should think through your arguments before you make them, especially on legal grounds.

First, I ask why that is nonsense. If an unborn child is a human, why should you allow that child to be murdered. Simply because it’s easy to do and the child won’t protest too much? Nice!

Or perhaps you have other reasons?

When it comes down to it, our government allows murder on 3 grounds:

1) In self-defense
2) by no-fault accident
3) by means of insanity

Numbers 2 and 3 remove personal culpability. This clearly does not apply to abortion, as it is pre-meditated. Number 1 would apply to the instance of a mother whose life is threatened by her pregnancy. At that point, terminating her pregnancy would be the equivalent of self-defense, and in that case, permissable.

I see no reason to not apply the 14th Amendment to abortion if you believe that the unborn are truly human. If not, let the abortions continue. There’s no reason to limit them in that case.


382 posted on 11/04/2007 6:25:16 PM PST by CheyennePress (Non Abbiamo Bisogno)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: CheyennePress
Just a small correction, #2 in some states does bring in personal culpulabiligy in the legal definition of negligence. Most States will give leeway in this but some will look for any negligence to go after the accused. (I know, off topic, but I wanted a decent discussion versus some of the stuff going on.)
390 posted on 11/04/2007 6:28:42 PM PST by mnehring (Ron Paul is to the Constitution what Fred Phelps is to the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson